One business. Four frameworks.
Three half-finished compliance programs.
You sell to US enterprise. They want SOC2 Type II. You sell to EU enterprise. They want ISO 27001 alongside SOC2. They are now asking about NIS2 alignment.
You process Indian customer data. DPDP enforcement is here. Penalties reach ₹250 crore.
If you are AI-native, your customers are also asking about ISO 42001 and AI training data residency. If you are in healthtech, HIPAA enters the conversation. If you handle payments, PCI does. If your customer is MAS-licensed, MAS TRM and Notice 658 come up in their vendor onboarding.
The traditional industry response is to run each framework as a separate project. Different consultants. Different timelines. Different evidence collection. Different audit firms. Different price tags. Most companies end up with three half-finished compliance programs and one passed audit.
Birchlogic was built around the opposite thesis. Evidence is collected once. Mapped across every regime that applies to your business. One program. One senior partner. One delivery cycle. One trust narrative for the customers asking.
The harder thing to build.
The cheaper thing to operate.
A SOC2 Type II audit and an ISO 27001 audit have something like 70 percent control overlap. A DPDP Act readiness program and a GDPR program share most of the privacy operational requirements. An ISO 42001 AIMS shares ISMS scaffolding with ISO 27001. A MAS TRM program reuses identity, vendor risk, and incident response controls that any of the above already covered.
Running these as separate projects means re-collecting the same evidence three times, paying three sets of consultants to interpret the same regulations differently, and producing three audit-ready packages that diverge over time as your business changes.
Running them as one multi-framework program means the evidence layer is unified, the policy authoring is unified, the audit narratives are unified, and your security team stops spending half its operational capacity on compliance theatre.
Six to eight weeks.
One unified evidence layer.
- Weeks 1 to 2
Discovery and scope.
We map every framework that currently applies to your business and every framework that will apply in the next 12 months. We identify the union of controls across all of them. We build a single evidence taxonomy that every framework draws from.
- Weeks 3 to 4
Policy and procedure layer.
We author the policy library once. Each policy is tagged with the frameworks it satisfies. Where frameworks demand different language for the same control, we resolve the differences in one document with framework-specific clauses.
- Weeks 5 to 6
Evidence operationalization.
Every control's evidence collection is built into the workflow that creates the evidence. Identity changes generate IAM audit logs. Cloud config changes generate Terraform commits. Vendor onboarding generates third-party assessment artifacts. Audit preparation stops being a sprint. It becomes a side-effect of normal engineering.
- Weeks 7 to 8
Audit firm coordination.
We bring you to two pre-vetted audit firms per framework. We attend the scoping calls. You select. We hand over evidence packages organized by framework. The audit timelines run in parallel, not in sequence.
- Throughout
Senior partner presence.
The senior who scoped is the senior who delivers. No handoffs. Partner attends every working session.
A unified evidence layer that survives.
Every framework you add over the next five years.
When a new regulation arrives (and a new one will), you map the union, not the union plus the previous unions. Your team's compliance overhead drops by 50 to 70 percent against the multi-project alternative.
A trust narrative your sales team can sell with. Your customers do not ask “do you have SOC2.” They ask “are you secure.” A multi-framework compliance program is the most credible answer to that question.
An audit-ready position you can maintain through continuous controls monitoring, not annual sprints. Your team stops dreading audit season.
Companies whose customers sit across multiple jurisdictions.
B2B SaaS founders selling to US, EU, and India simultaneously. Fintechs serving regulated banks across two or more countries. Healthtech companies handling US, EU, and India patient data. AI-native startups whose customer questionnaires now span four frameworks per quarter.
The buyer is the CTO, the Head of Engineering, or the CFO. The trigger is usually one specific customer or regulator asking for one specific framework, and the realization that the next three customers will ask for three more frameworks.
If you are running one compliance project per quarter and falling further behind, this is what we built for you.
Three things this is not.
This is not a tooling project. We work with Vanta, Drata, Sprinto, Secureframe, and Scrut as partners. The platform layer matters and we have opinions about which to use, but it is not the program.
This is not a one-time audit. Audits are an output of the program, not the program itself.
This is not a compliance checkbox. If you want a SOC2 report so you can close one US deal and never think about security again, hire someone else. There are firms in the market for that. We are not one of them.
The first 20 minutes are us understanding which frameworks actually apply to your business in the next 12 months. The last 10 minutes are us telling you which combination we would deliver in six to eight weeks, and how the unified evidence layer changes everything downstream.
If you are running one compliance project at a time, this conversation will save you 18 months.